There is, in my opionion, no fair comparison on the lives of Michael Jackson and the legendary anchor newsperson, Walter Cronkite. The lives were different and can not be compared; as a result, I had anticipated that the news coverage would be totally different. The news coverage on Michael continued for weeks after his untimely death and was extremely negative. I believe, and my opion is more than likely bias, that bad news makes money for our pseudo news reports and cable news stations.
Walter Cronkite's news was clear, concise and very informative. Compared to the over exposed coverage we receive on cable, Mr. Cronkite's news delivery was an art and it does appear that it is now a dying art form. To be honest with you, I have grown tired of sensational news coverage of Michael Jackson, Anna Nicole Smith, Brittany Spears, etc. etc. etc. This type of pseudo news continues because it makes money and the public love it. If we demanded more from our newspapers and cable networks, quality news would be delivered. Granted...my opinion is bias and may also be somewhat jaded.
Walter Cronkite's news was clear, concise and very informative. Compared to the over exposed coverage we receive on cable, Mr. Cronkite's news delivery was an art and it does appear that it is now a dying art form. To be honest with you, I have grown tired of sensational news coverage of Michael Jackson, Anna Nicole Smith, Brittany Spears, etc. etc. etc. This type of pseudo news continues because it makes money and the public love it. If we demanded more from our newspapers and cable networks, quality news would be delivered. Granted...my opinion is bias and may also be somewhat jaded.
Comments